Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture No. 2/05
The technical and cost efficiencies of hybrid maize production in western Ethiopia
Arega D. Alene
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria
Rashid M. Hassan
University of Pretoria, South Africa
and Mulat Demeke
Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
Abstract
Conventional farmer efficiency studies have addressed the question of
whether possibilities exist for inexpensive gains in production through
better use of traditional technology. The question of whether the
production potentials of new seed technologies have been fully
exploited by poor farmers has rarely been a concern. This paper uses a
translog stochastic frontier and inefficiency model to analyse
technical efficiency and the factors underlying efficiency
differentials among a sample of hybrid maize producers in western
Ethiopia. It also uses a dual cost frontier model to compute the cost
efficiency of the sample farmers. The results revealed an average
technical inefficiency of 25%, showing that farmers actually operate
with substantial inefficiency under new technology. This suggests that
a considerable maize yield potential remains to be exploited through
better use of the technology. An average cost inefficiency of 39% was
obtained from the dual model, indicating that farmers could raise the
profitability of maize production by 39% by fully adjusting input use.
In view of the prevailing high prices of fertilizer against very low
price of maize, fertilizer cost inefficiencies among farmers were
mainly due to the use of more, rather than less, fertilizer, and this
indicates the divergence between economic and biological optimum
arising from unfavourable input and output prices facing the farmers.
Education, provision of input credit, land tenure, and timely
availability of critical inputs are found to be important factors
influencing the technical efficiency of maize farmers.
Keywords: dual cost frontier, technical efficiency, cost efficiency, hybrid maize, Ethiopia
Vol. 44 (2005), No. 2: 167-181